Sales turnover is expensive. You lose more than a salesperson. You lose product knowledge, customer relationships, pipeline history and the time invested in training that person.
The obvious response is often: “Do we need to pay people more?”
Sometimes, yes. But that is only part of the problem.
A badly designed sales incentive plan can make good salespeople question whether their targets are achievable, whether their effort will be rewarded fairly and, eventually, whether they should stay.
So perhaps the better question is: Could your sales incentive plan be contributing to employee turnover?
Key Takeaways
- Sales compensation can influence retention, but simply increasing pay does not solve every turnover problem.
- Sellers need a clear connection between performance, targets and financial reward.
- Unreasonable quotas, poorly designed caps, unclear crediting rules and unfair territories can undermine trust.
- Transparency matters. Salespeople should understand what they can earn, how they earn it and why.
- Review incentive plans when turnover rises rather than assuming the problem sits entirely with recruitment, management or the salesperson.
Invest in yourself by buying my book HERE to learn how to design the most effective sales incentive program for your salesforce.
If you’re looking to grow your sales and build stronger client relationships, take a look at how I help teams like yours — and feel free to reach out for a chat.
Does Sales Compensation Really Affect Employee Turnover?
Yes, although compensation should not be treated as the only factor.
WorldatWork’s 2022 Sales Compensation Programs & Practices research found that 87% of surveyed organisations were taking action to reduce voluntary turnover. Half had offered higher base salaries for sales roles, while 39% had increased incentive opportunities.
More recent WorldatWork research adds an important qualification. Its 2026 State of Rewards research found that 93% of employees considered competitive pay important for retention, but compensation alone was a relatively weak predictor of who actually stayed. Career development, recognition, meaningful work and flexibility also matter.
The lesson: competitive compensation may get you into the retention game. It does not win the game by itself.
How Can a Sales Incentive Plan Push Good Salespeople Out?
A sales compensation plan sends a message about what the company values.
Unfortunately, sometimes it sends the wrong message.
Imagine an experienced salesperson who repeatedly performs well. Then:
- Their quota increases substantially without a corresponding increase in market opportunity.
- A major account moves to another territory.
- Their commission is capped after they exceed target.
- Sales crediting rules change halfway through the year.
- They cannot easily understand their commission statement.
Eventually, the problem is no longer simply money.
It becomes a question of fairness and trust.
That matters because SHRM, citing Payscale research involving more than 578,000 workers, reported that improving employees’ perception of fair pay could reduce their intention to leave by 27%. Pay transparency alone was associated with a 30% reduction in intent to quit when analysed independently.
I’ve just finished writing something new and insightful—and I think you’ll find it valuable. I wanted to offer it to you first.
FREE Guide – Sales Compensation and Sales Incentives: Click HERE
Which Parts of a Sales Incentive Plan Affect Retention Most?
1. Is the earning opportunity worth the effort?
Salespeople accept variable compensation because higher performance should create higher rewards.
If someone significantly exceeds quota but receives only a marginal additional reward, the incentive loses its purpose.
Equally, arbitrary commission caps can create exactly the wrong behaviour. Once the maximum payout has been reached, why should the salesperson continue pushing?
Gartner describes pay curves as an important part of creating a clear connection between seller performance and earned income.
2. Are the quotas realistically achievable?
A high quota is not necessarily motivating.
An achievable but challenging quota can drive performance. A quota perceived as impossible can do the opposite.
Xactly’s 2025 Sales Compensation Report found that 87% of surveyed sales teams reported struggling to meet or exceed quota targets. External market conditions were cited by 53% as a significant barrier.
That should make leaders ask a difficult question:
Are underperforming sellers really the problem, or has the organisation created targets that no longer reflect market reality?
3. Is the plan clear enough?
A salesperson should not need a spreadsheet expert to understand how much they are going to earn.
A strong plan makes several things obvious:
- What am I expected to achieve?
- Which activities or outcomes count?
- How is performance credited?
- What happens when I exceed target?
- When and how will I be paid?
Complexity creates confusion. Confusion creates disputes. Repeated disputes damage trust.
Interestingly, WorldatWork found that 71% of organisations use two to three performance measures in their sales compensation plans. More metrics do not automatically produce better performance.
4. Are territories and opportunities fair?
Two salespeople can have identical quotas but completely different opportunities to achieve them.
One inherits mature accounts. Another gets an underdeveloped territory.
One sells into a growing market. Another faces declining demand.
If incentive design ignores territory potential, account allocation and opportunity, salespeople can quickly conclude that their earnings depend more on allocation decisions than performance.
Common Mistakes
When turnover increases, organisations sometimes react too quickly.
Common mistakes include:
- Increasing base salary without investigating the underlying problem.
- Lowering quotas across the board.
- Adding another bonus or SPIF.
- Changing the plan halfway through the performance period.
- Capping high performers to control compensation costs.
- Making plans so complicated that sellers cannot predict their earnings.
- Reviewing compensation without analysing territory and quota allocation.
More money cannot compensate indefinitely for a plan employees consider unfair.
What Does a Good Sales Incentive Plan Look Like?
A retention-friendly incentive plan does not mean making targets easy.
It means creating a system in which good performers believe they have a fair opportunity to succeed and benefit from that success.
Start by reviewing five areas:
- Earnings potential: Is total compensation competitive for the role and market?
- Quota attainment: What percentage of the team can realistically achieve quota?
- Pay curve: Does exceptional performance produce meaningful additional reward?
- Crediting and territories: Are opportunities and sales credits allocated fairly?
- Transparency: Can sellers easily understand their performance and expected payout?
Then look at the data by role, territory, tenure and performance level.
If your strongest sellers are disproportionately leaving, do not treat that as a normal HR turnover statistic. Investigate the incentive system.
Sales Retention Starts With Trust
You cannot eliminate sales turnover through compensation alone.
People leave because of managers, career opportunities, culture, workload, changing priorities and many other reasons.
However, the sales incentive plan is one of the few mechanisms that touches performance, recognition, fairness and financial reward simultaneously.
That makes it a sensible place to investigate when turnover starts increasing.
A strong incentive plan tells salespeople:
“If you perform, you will be recognised and rewarded fairly.”
A weak one creates doubt about whether the effort is worth it.
If your organisation is experiencing higher sales turnover, review the plan before assuming you simply need to recruit different people.
Sometimes the retention problem is already sitting inside the compensation model.
FAQs
Can changing a sales incentive plan reduce employee turnover?
It can help when compensation design contributes to dissatisfaction. Review quota attainability, pay competitiveness, earning potential, territory allocation, sales crediting and transparency. However, compensation should be analysed alongside management, career development, workload and other retention factors.
Should we increase sales salaries to improve retention?
Not automatically. Competitive pay matters, but simply increasing base salaries may not address unfair quotas, weak accelerators, unclear commission calculations or poor territory allocation. Diagnose the cause before changing the cost structure.
How often should a sales incentive plan be reviewed?
At minimum, conduct a structured review annually. Gartner recommends that sales leaders assess each year whether changing business priorities, costs or seller attrition justify redesigning the compensation plan. Significant changes in strategy, products, territories or market conditions may require an earlier review.
FREE Ebook – Choose the right sales compensation plan: Click HERE
If you’d like to receive more insights like this and be part of a small group I email from time to time, just sign up using this link.
In case you are looking to grow your business, I am here with you. Fill up THIS form and let’s talk.
